Goal+2


 * Goal #2: We will continuously improve student performance. ||
 * If the CAI Division effectively provides support in the use of research proven practice, then campuses will be equipped to provide an engaging and motivating learning experience for students in a way that is differentiated, enhances higher level thinking skills and is aligned to the TEKS as measured by TAKS results, commended rates of at least 50%, a student gap closure within 6% and 100% of students graduating college and career ready. ||
 * Target #1: Use student performance data to inform decisions through the organization. ||
 * Approach || Person(s) Responsible || Timeline || Resources || Formative Evaluation || Summative Evaluation ||
 * A: Campuses will develop a Needs Assessment over 3 years. ||  ||   ||   ||   || All but 2 campuses show continuous improvement or maintenance at the Exemplary level for each TAKS exam with gap closures within by each student group. ||
 * Deployment: ||||||  ||   ||   ||
 * 1. A common needs assessment is developed and provided to each principal. || Director of Student Interventions || April 2010-June 2010 || Time and Effort ||  ||   ||
 * 2. Trend lines of convergence toward less than 6% gap and advancement with campus targets over each TAKS test are provided by student group (all students, White, African American, Hispanic, EcD, LEP and special education). || Campus Principal || June 2010-September 2010 || Time and Effort, AEIS reports, and PBMAS ||  ||   ||
 * 3. Data using as many as 3 QI comparable schools are averaged to create campus targets for improvement. || Campus Principal || June 2010-September 2010 || AEIS Comparable schools report ||  ||   ||
 * 4. The needs assessment is posted on each campus web-page. || Campus Principal || October 1, 2010 || Time and Effort ||  ||   ||
 * Approach || Person Responsible || Timeline || Resources || Formative Evaluation || Summative Evaluation ||
 * B: Campuses will develop an action plan based on identified needs to improve student performance. ||  ||   ||   ||   || At least 8 BISD campuses have at least 50% of tests being “above the line” in using linear regression as reported by NCES Just 4 the Kids. ||
 * Deployment: ||||||  ||   ||   ||
 * 1. Campus Comprehensive Needs Assessments (CNA)s will guide targets, approaches, and deployments of Campus Improvement Plans (CIP)s. || Campus Principal || September 1, 2010 || Time and Effort ||  ||   ||
 * 2. CIPs will be presented to Cabinet using prescribed presentation format. || Campus Principal || October 1, 2010 || Time and Effort ||  ||   ||
 * 3 ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * 4 ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Target #2: Develop a relevant BISD curriculum designed for the 21st century students, that equitably engages students across all schools. ||
 * Approach || Person Responsible || Timeline || Resources || Formative Evaluation || Summative Evaluation ||
 * A: Develop Power Standards for English/Language Arts (K-12) and improve upon the developed Power Standards in Math and Science. ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Deployment: ||||||  ||   ||   ||
 * 1. Identify focus group ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * 2. Determine Power Standards ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * 3. Isolate terms in need of defining ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * 4. Develop matrix that designate student expectations for each marking period (Ex. Coppell model) ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Approach || Person Responsible || Timeline || Resources || Formative Evaluation || Summative Evaluation ||
 * B: Develop and implement student friendly learning targets to provide measurable and understandable goals for learning. ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Deployment: ||||||  ||   ||   ||
 * 1 ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * 2 ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * 3 ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * 4 ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Approach || Person Responsible || Timeline || Resources || Formative Evaluation || Summative Evaluation ||
 * C: Develop a standard’s based report card for first grade and refine the current standard’s based kindergarten report card. ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Deployment: ||||||  ||   ||   ||
 * 1. Identify focus group ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * 2. PDSA 2009-2010 report card ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * 3. Develop grading matrix for each standard and for each marking period ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * 4. Get teacher feedback on report card and matrix ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * 5. Provide teacher training ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * 6. Provide parent training ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * 7. Deploy the report card ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * 8. PDSA the standards and reporting system ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Approach || Person Responsible || Timeline || Resources || Formative Evaluation || Summative Evaluation ||
 * D: Develop a plan to monitor and facilitate the integration of the College and Career Readiness Standards into the curriculum. ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Deployment: ||||||  ||   ||   ||
 * 1 || Dir. Learning Technologies and CTE, Dir. Staff Development ||  ||   ||   ||   ||
 * 2 || Campus administration ||  ||   ||   ||   ||
 * 3 ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * 4 ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * 5 ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Approach || Person Responsible || Timeline || Resources || Formative Evaluation || Summative Evaluation ||
 * E: Integrate core curriculum TEKS into CTE courses as appropriate. ||  ||   ||   || 100% CTE teachers have attended ESC 11 CTE TEKS training. || PDAS and Lesson Planning data will show appropriate core subject TEKS are being implemented in 100% of CTE courses. ||
 * Deployment: ||||||  ||   ||   ||
 * 1. Ensure all CTE teachers attend ESC 11 CTE TEKS training || Dir. Learning Technologies and CTE, Campus Administration || March 2010 - Dec. 2010 || $4,200.00 for Substitutes ||  ||   ||
 * 2. Develop a plan to have a CTE integration review time for the District integration day. || Dir. Learning Technologies and CTE, Campus Administration || June- August || Time and effort ||  ||   ||
 * 3. Implement plan || Dir. Learning Technologies and CTE, Campus Administration || Aug-10 || Title II ||  ||   ||
 * 4 ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Approach || Person Responsible || Timeline || Resources || Formative Evaluation || Summative Evaluation ||
 * F: Ensure that all CTE teachers have required preparation and certifications for teaching the revised curriculum and are following the new TEKS. ||  ||   ||   || Results of observations indicate teachers have a comfort level with the new TEKS. || 100% of CTE teachers are using the new TEKS for each of their courses. ||
 * Deployment: ||||||  ||   ||   ||
 * 1. Monitor attendance at CTE TEKS workshops provided by ESC 11 || Dir. Learning Technologies and CTE, Campus Administration || January 2010 - December 2010 || ESC 11 records and Time and Effort ||  ||   ||
 * 2. Develop a certification check list and complete with Human Resources' input || Dir. Learning Technologies and CTE, Human Resources, Campus Administration || July 2010-September 2010 || Human Resources, SBEC reports ||  ||   ||
 * 3. Develop an observation plan to monitor the use of new CTE TEKS || Dir. Learning Technologies and CTE, Campus Administration || August 2010-September 2010 || PDAS ||  ||   ||
 * 4. Monitor use of observation plan || Dir. Learning Technologies and CTE || October 2010 - April 2011 || PDAS ||  ||   ||
 * Approach || Person Responsible || Timeline || Resources || Formative Evaluation || Summative Evaluation ||
 * G: Increase BEST Kit utilization to improve student performance for all students. ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Deployment: ||||||  ||   ||   ||
 * 1 ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * 2 ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * 3 ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * 4 ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Approach || Person Responsible || Timeline || Resources || Formative Evaluation || Summative Evaluation ||
 * H: Ensure that the written curriculum for BEST Kits is updated for teachers and that Spanish translation is available for the K-4 science curriculum. ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Deployment: ||||||  ||   ||   ||
 * 1 ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * 2 ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * 3 ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * 4 ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Approach || Person Responsible || Timeline || Resources || Formative Evaluation || Summative Evaluation ||
 * I: Develop and deploy an effective approach to significantly improve student success with bottleneck courses. ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Deployment: ||||||  ||   ||   ||
 * 1 ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * 2 ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * 3 ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * 4 ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Target #3: Develop a Problem- Based set of annual units for one high school grade level of ELA, Math, Science, and Social Studies that meets all TEKS listed in the sequence documents. ||
 * Approach || Person Responsible || Timeline || Resources || Formative Evaluation || Summative Evaluation ||
 * A: Develop a model and implement an approach to create problem-based units for regular tenth grade classes of ELA, Math, Science, and Social Studies that cover all Tier I TEKS. ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Deployment: ||||||  ||   ||   ||
 * 1 ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * 2 ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * 3 ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * 4 ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Target #4: Align and deploy the BISD Early Reading Literacy Program for strong readers by third grade. ||
 * Approach || Person Responsible || Timeline || Resources || Formative Evaluation || Summative Evaluation ||
 * A: The BISD Early Reading Literacy Program is clearly defined and a professional development program is in place to support it. ||  ||   ||   || Define leading indicators here || Data reveals continuous improvement toward 98% of student success at each campus by 3rd grade. ||
 * Deployment: ||||||  ||   ||   ||
 * 1 ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * 2 ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * 3 ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * 4 ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Target #5: Align and deploy the BISD Early Math Literacy Program for strong readers by third grade. ||
 * Approach || Person Responsible || Timeline || Resources || Formative Evaluation || Summative Evaluation ||
 * A: The BISD Early Math Literacy Program is clearly defined and a professional development program is in place to support it. ||  ||   ||   || Define leading indicators here || Data reveals continuous improvement toward 98% of student success at each campus by 3rd grade. ||
 * Deployment: ||||||  ||   ||   ||
 * 1 ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * 2 ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * 3 ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * 4 ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Target #6: Provide district-wide end-of-unit common assessments (checkpoints) for the purpose of auditing the quality and effectiveness of the written and taught curriculum. ||
 * Approach || Person Responsible || Timeline || Resources || Formative Evaluation || Summative Evaluation ||
 * A: Expand the capacity for campuses to develop quality common quality assessments to at least --- campuses. ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Deployment: ||||||  ||   ||   ||
 * 1 ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * 2 ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * 3 ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * 4 ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Target #7: Differentiate instruction for improved commended scores rather than have the students modify themselves to the curriculum presentation. ||
 * Approach || Person Responsible || Timeline || Resources || Formative Evaluation || Summative Evaluation ||
 * A: Support teachers and campuses in research proven practices to provide a differentiated learning experience based on the PLP model of differentiated instruction. ||  ||   ||   || 50% of teachers have a documented individual professional learning plan addressing deployment of differentiation strategies. || All but 4 campuses are making adequate progress toware 50% commended rates. ||
 * Deployment: ||||||  ||   ||   ||
 * 1 Communicate the new Professional Learning Plan and gradual release of responsibility model. || Director of Professional Development; Instructional Coaches, Campus Administration || 17-Aug-10 || Time and Effort ||  ||   ||
 * 2 Administer teacher self-evaluation of professional learning needs. || Director of Professional Development; Campus Administration; Teachers || Aug-10 || Time and Effort ||  ||   ||
 * 3 Conduct and analyze a needs assessment of professional development needs for the campus, teaching teams, and individual teacher needs. || Campus Administration; UC's || Oct-10 || Time and Effort ||  ||   ||
 * 4 Determine teacher and campus goals for professional learning. || Campus Administration; UC's; Teachers || Teacher goals: September 2010 Campus goals: September 2010 || Time and Effort ||  ||   ||
 * 5. Determine training delivery method. || IC's, Campus Trainers, Campus Administration ||  || Time and Effort ||   ||   ||
 * 6. Conduct and provide training || Instructional Coaches; Campus Trainers, Outside Presenters || Ongoing || Time and Effort; PD Funds, Title II Funds ||  ||   ||
 * 7. Check for teacher application of learning in the classroom. || Campus administration || Jan-11 || BISD Walk-throughs; Time and Effort ||  ||   ||
 * 8. PDSA || Director of Professional Development || Mar-11 || Time and Effort ||  ||   ||
 * 9. Campuses document in their CIP's their differentiation plan for GT students. || Director of Student Interventions; Campus Administration || Oct-10 || Time and Effort ||  ||   ||
 * Approach || Person Responsible || Timeline || Resources || Formative Evaluation || Summative Evaluation ||
 * B: Define and deploy a common instructional model based upon the gradual release of responsibility so that students are accountable for their own learning. ||  ||   ||   || BOY-year data will provide baseline on GRR deployment. || The BISD Instructional Model has been deployed with appropriate and pervasive staff development. ||
 * Deployment: ||||||  ||   ||   ||
 * 1. Survey campuses to gather information on extent to which GRR has been deployed. || Director of Professional Development || Sep-10 || Time and Effort ||  ||   ||
 * 2 Provide training opportunities for teacher training in GRR. || Director of Professional Development, Campus Administration, Instructional Coaches || Began Summer Institute 2009, continued 2009-2010 school year and into Summer Institute 2010 and throughout 2010-2011 school year || Time and Effort ||  ||   ||
 * 3 Conduct follow-up survey. || Director of Professional Development || May-11 || Time and Effort ||  ||   ||
 * PDSA training model and delivery for continuous improvement. || Director of Professional Development || May-11 || Time and Effort ||  ||   ||
 * Approach || Person Responsible || Timeline || Resources || Formative Evaluation || Summative Evaluation ||
 * C: Provide training and support for “Laying the Foundation” strategies, instruction, resources, and technology at the secondary level, linked to high level think skills and coursework rigor through the secondary GT offerings. ||  ||   ||   || 25% of Pre-Ap/AP teachers will have had initial training in Laying the Foundation || 50% of Pre-AP / AP teachers will have had initial training in Laying the Foundation ||
 * Deployment: ||||||  ||   ||   ||
 * 1 Identify training sites. || Director of Staff Development || Ongoing || Time and Effort ||  ||   ||
 * 2 Identify teachers in need of training. || Director of Staff Development; LTF training sites || Initially June 2009 and now ongoing || Time and Effort ||  ||   ||
 * Provide opportunities for secondaryadministrator training and Math coordinator training. || Director of Staff Development || Training made available June 2009 and June 2010 and will continue when in area || Time and Effort; HS Allotment Funds ||  ||   ||
 * 3 Provide opportunites for secondary Instructional Coaches for continual campus support. || Director of Staff Development || Training made available June 2010 and will continue when in area || Time and Effort: High School Allotment Funds ||  ||   ||
 * 4 Campuses create a plan for monitoring the implementarion of LTF and integrate the plan into the CIP. || Secondary Campus Administration || October 2010 in CIP; Monitoring-Ongoing || Time and Effort ||  ||   ||
 * Approach || Person Responsible || Timeline || Resources || Formative Evaluation || Summative Evaluation ||
 * D: Implement the BISD walk-through form and develop comparative data to encourage administrative collaboration throughout the district. ||  ||   ||   ||   || Teacher feedback reports reflect an increase in effective research-proven practice. ||
 * Deployment: ||||||  ||   ||   ||
 * 1. Include teachers receiving feedback. ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * 2 ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * 3 ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * 4 ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Approach || Person Responsible || Timeline || Resources || Formative Evaluation || Summative Evaluation ||
 * E: Increase teacher competency in the use of learning technologies so they can provide engaging lessons. ||  ||   ||   ||   || STaR Chart will indicate an increase in teacher comfort level with student use of technology. ||
 * Deployment: ||||||  ||   ||   ||
 * 1. Provide campus support LTCL. || Director of Learning Technologies and CTE || August 2010- June 2011 || Title II ||  ||   ||
 * 2. Use data from STaR Chart and surveys to plan staff development. || Director of Learning Technologies and CTE || January 2010-August 2011 || time and effort ||  ||   ||
 * 3. Provide technology staff development in Summer Institute. || Director of Learning Technologies and CTE || Jul-10 || Gas and Oil $ ||  ||   ||
 * 4. Provide Technology Summer Academies.x || Director of Learning Technologies and CTE || June - August 2010 || Gas and Oil $ ||  ||   ||
 * 5. Provide campus based training as requested by campus administration || Director of Learning Technologies and CTE, ICT || August 2010-June 2011 || Time and Effort ||  ||   ||
 * Target #8: Differentiate the learning opportunities and improve the academic performance of students with learning obstacles through the BISD. ||
 * Approach || Person Responsible || Timeline || Resources || Formative Evaluation || Summative Evaluation ||
 * A: Develop and implement an academic secondary RtI Model on ___ campuses. ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Deployment: ||||||  ||   ||   ||
 * 1 || Director of Student Interventions ||  ||   ||   ||   ||
 * 2 ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * 3 ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * 4 ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Approach || Person Responsible || Timeline || Resources || Formative Evaluation || Summative Evaluation ||
 * B: Develop an implementation and training plan for the district K-12 behavior RtI model . ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Deployment: ||||||  ||   ||   ||
 * 1 ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * 2 ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * 3 ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * 4 ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Approach || Person Responsible || Timeline || Resources || Formative Evaluation || Summative Evaluation ||
 * C: Monitor the implementation of the Professional Learning Plan and develop a measurement system to determine levels of effectiveness. ||  ||   ||   || 50% of the teachers have a documented professional learning plan addressing differentiation strategies. || 25% of the documented professional learning plans will show an increase in implementation of the strategies within one year of training. ||
 * Deployment: ||||||  ||   ||   ||
 * 1 Professional learning plans will be documented on paper initially. || Campus administration; Teachers || August-Septermber 2010 ||  ||   ||   ||
 * 2 Professional learning plans will be put into an electronic system. || Campus administration; Teachers || September-October 2010 ||  ||   ||   ||
 * 3 Principals will conduct walk-through observations monitoring PLP goals and strategies. || Campus administration || October 2010-end of school year ||  ||   ||   ||
 * 4 Principals and teachers will re-assess goals and progress on the PLP at the end of the year. || Campus administration; Teachers || Discussions with teachers throughout the year; Summative conferences ||  ||   ||   ||
 * 5 Electronic data will be pulled from the system to determine progress at the district level; Principals should be able to determine campus growth through walk-through data. || Director of Staff Development; Director of Learning Technology; Director of Data Services; Campus Administration || Jun-11 ||  ||   ||   ||
 * Approach || Person Responsible || Timeline || Resources || Formative Evaluation || Summative Evaluation ||
 * D: Implement a pilot Co-teach Model on at least two elementary campuses. ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Deployment: ||||||  ||   ||   ||
 * 1.Gather data on campus interest in developing and deploying a co-teacher model. || Director of Special Education Elementary Special Education Coordinator || Fall 2010 || Federal IDEIA Funds Time & Effort ||  ||   ||
 * 2. Schedule training for campuses who will deploy the co-teach model. || Director of Special Education Elementary Special Education Coordinator || Summer 2010 || Federal IDEIA Funds Time & Effort ||  ||   ||
 * 3. Determine campus needs for successful deployment. || Director of Special Education Elementary Special Education Coordinator || Summer 2010 || Federal IDEIA Funds Time & Effort ||  ||   ||
 * Approach || Person Responsible || Timeline || Resources ||  ||   ||
 * E. Implement a universal screener and progress monitoring system in math and reading on at least 2 elementary schools. ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Deployment: ||||||  ||   ||   ||
 * 1 || Director of Special Education || Fall 2010 || Federal IDEIA Stimulus Funds ||  ||   ||
 * 2 ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * 3 ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * 4 ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Approach || Person Responsible || Timeline || Resources || Formative Evaluation || Summative Evaluation ||
 * F. Expand the implementation of progress monitoring in middle and high school resource classrooms. ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Deployment: ||||||  ||   ||   ||
 * 1.Gather data on campus interest in developing and deploying a co-teacher model. || Director of Special Education Elementary Special Education Coordinator || Fall 2010 || Federal IDEIA Funds Time & Effort ||  ||   ||
 * G. Ensure that campuses are addressing student learning gaps in CTE programs ||  ||   ||   ||   || Special Education and LEP students are meeting or exceeding the state standard as measured by 2011 PBMAS ||
 * Deployment: ||||||  ||   ||   ||
 * 1. Identify campus administrator responsible for oversight || High school principal || Aug-10 || Time and effort ||  ||   ||
 * 2. Identify the students who are special ed or LEP and CTE concentrators || Campus adminiatrator or designee || Aug-2010 - Jan 2011 || Time and effort ||  ||   ||
 * 3. Identify a campus focus group to develop a plan to accellerate the identified students and document in campus improvement plan || Campus Administrator || Sep-10 || Time and effort ||  ||   ||
 * 4. Submit plan to district CTE PBMAS Team || Campus Administrator || Sep-10 || Time and effort ||  ||   ||
 * 5. Collect Data and report to CTE PBMAS Team || Campus Administrator || Oct-10 || Time and effort ||  ||   ||
 * 6. PDAS to determine effectivenesss of plan and make adjustments for improvement || Campus Administrator || Jan-11 || Time and effort ||  ||   ||
 * Target #9: Engage local colleges, universities, and virtual schools in strengthening our dual credit/online course offerings for advanced academic coursework. ||
 * Approach || Person Responsible || Timeline || Resources || Formative Evaluation || Summative Evaluation ||
 * A: Define and assess post-secondary schooling acceptance standards. ||  ||   ||   || Baseline data on percent of BISD students accepted to post-secondary schools. || 70% of BISD students are accepted to post-secondary schools. ||
 * Deployment: ||||||  ||   ||   ||
 * 1 Determine baseline data on percent of BISD students accepted to post-secondary schools. || Advanced Academics Coordinator || May 20010 ||  ||   ||   ||
 * 2 Track seniors to determine acceptance into post-secondary schools. || Director of Professional Development; High School Counselors || Ongoing ||  ||   ||   ||
 * 3 Work with seniors on trying to increase percentage of students accepted to post-secondary schools. || Director of Professional Development; High School Counselors ||  ||   ||   ||   ||
 * 4 Evalute numbers || Director of Professional Development; High School Counselors ||  ||   ||   ||   ||
 * 5. PDSA || Director of Professional Development; High School Counselors ||  ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Approach || Person Responsible || Timeline || Resources || Formative Evaluation || Summative Evaluation ||
 * B: Maintain, inform, and support our partnerships with local colleges and universities. ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Deployment: ||||||  ||   ||   ||
 * 1 ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * 2 ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * 3 ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * 4 ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Approach || Person Responsible || Timeline || Resources || Formative Evaluation || Summative Evaluation ||
 * C: Implement a diagnostic assessment that provides the BISD with the number of students who can continue to post-secondary education without taking remedial courses. ||  ||   ||   || Baseline data on 11th grade examinees meeting TSI Higher Education Readiness Standards in Reading and Math || 70% of 11th grade examinees will meet the TSI Higher Education Readiness Components in Reading and Math ||
 * Deployment: ||||||  ||   ||   ||
 * 1. Identify focus group || Asst. Supt. Of CAI, Director of Professional Development || Mar-10 || Time and Effort ||  ||   ||
 * 2. Survey post-secondary schools to determine entrance test used for college readiness and cut scores used. || Advanced Academics Coordinator || Apr-10 || Time and Effort ||  ||   ||
 * 3. Determine when to assess BISD students. || Asst. Supt. Of CAI, Director of Professional Development || Sep-10 || Time and Effort ||  ||   ||
 * 4. Determine how to assess BISD students. || Asst. Supt. Of CAI, Director of Professional Development || Sep-10 || Time and Effort ||  ||   ||
 * 5. Identify students planning to attend college who have not been determined to be college ready. || Director of Staff Development, Academic Secondary AP's, High School Counselors || September 2010 initially and ongoing || Time and Effort ||  ||   ||
 * 6. Administer assessment ensuring that BISD is recipient of scores. || College campus with whom articulated agreement || March-May 2011 || Time and Effort ||  ||   ||
 * 7. Analyze college ready percentage upon receipt of results. || Director of Professional Development, High School Counselors || May-11 || Time and Effort ||  ||   ||
 * 8. PDSA the process || Director of Staff Development || Jun-11 || Time and Effort ||  ||   ||
 * Approach || Person Responsible || Timeline || Resources || Formative Evaluation || Summative Evaluation ||
 * D: Create an awareness for administration and professional staff to the College and Career Readiness Standards and the expectation for creating an atmosphere for post-secondary education throughout the school, as evidenced by high expectations by parents and students that the campus is preparing students for post-secondary study. ||  ||   ||   || Compare baseline information from 2009 parent and student surveys in October to 2010 survey feedback || Compare baseline information from 2009 parent and student end-of-year surveys to 2010 survey feedback to show continuous improvement ||
 * Deployment: ||||||  ||   ||   ||
 * 1. Distribute informational presentation to campus administrators prepared and approved by CCRS Team. || Dir. Learning Technologies and CTE, Dir. Staff Development || May 2010 for first look; September 2010 for refined look || Time and Effort ||  ||   ||
 * 2. Present informational presentation to all professional staff. || Campus administration || Sep-10 || Time and Effort ||  ||   ||
 * 3. CTE Teachers attend presentations at ESC 11 that include CCRS information. || Director of Learning Technologies and CTE teachers || 2009-2011 at ESC when training available || Funds for ESC training, Time and Effort ||  ||   ||
 * 4. CCR team attend ESC training on CCRS. || Director of Learning Technologies, Director of Staff Development, CCRS Team || October 2009, March 2010, August 2010 || Funds for ESC training, Time and Effort ||  ||   ||
 * 4 Campuses development a plan for creating an atmosphere of CCR and integrate the plan(s) into the CIP. || Campus administration || Oct-10 || Time and Effort ||  ||   ||
 * PDSA the effectiveness of campus CCR strategies. || Director of Learning Technologies, Director of Staff Development, Campus administration || April-May 2011 || Time and Effort ||  ||   ||
 * Approach || Person Responsible || Timeline || Resources || Formative Evaluation || Summative Evaluation ||
 * E: Provide students with opportunities that will promote college and career readiness skills across all grade levels. ||  ||   ||   ||   || Student surveys indicate a post-secondary expectation exists in school at some level. ||
 * Deployment: ||||||  ||   ||   ||
 * 1. Deploy and assess the leading indicator system and improve with cycles of learning. ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * 2. Expand opportunities for students to take high school and college classes online through TxVSN and StateU. || Dir. Learning Technologies and CTE ||  ||   ||   ||   ||
 * 3 ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * 4 ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Target #11: Engage local departments of education to use BISD as a training and research location for student teachers because of our professional development program and educator expectations. ||
 * Approach || Person Responsible || Timeline || Resources || Formative Evaluation || Summative Evaluation ||
 * A: ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Deployment: ||||||  ||   ||   ||
 * 1 || Ass’t Supt for Human Resources. ||  ||   ||   ||   ||
 * 2 ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * 3 ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * 4 ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Approach || Person Responsible || Timeline || Resources || Formative Evaluation || Summative Evaluation ||
 * D: Create an awareness for administration and professional staff to the College and Career Readiness Standards and the expectation for creating an atmosphere for post-secondary education throughout the school, as evidenced by high expectations by parents and students that the campus is preparing students for post-secondary study. ||  ||   ||   || Compare baseline information from 2009 parent and student surveys in October to 2010 survey feedback || Compare baseline information from 2009 parent and student end-of-year surveys to 2010 survey feedback to show continuous improvement ||
 * Deployment: ||||||  ||   ||   ||
 * 1. Distribute informational presentation to campus administrators prepared and approved by CCRS Team. || Dir. Learning Technologies and CTE, Dir. Staff Development || May 2010 for first look; September 2010 for refined look || Time and Effort ||  ||   ||
 * 2. Present informational presentation to all professional staff. || Campus administration || Sep-10 || Time and Effort ||  ||   ||
 * 3. CTE Teachers attend presentations at ESC 11 that include CCRS information. || Director of Learning Technologies and CTE teachers || 2009-2011 at ESC when training available || Funds for ESC training, Time and Effort ||  ||   ||
 * 4. CCR team attend ESC training on CCRS. || Director of Learning Technologies, Director of Staff Development, CCRS Team || October 2009, March 2010, August 2010 || Funds for ESC training, Time and Effort ||  ||   ||
 * 4 Campuses development a plan for creating an atmosphere of CCR and integrate the plan(s) into the CIP. || Campus administration || Oct-10 || Time and Effort ||  ||   ||
 * PDSA the effectiveness of campus CCR strategies. || Director of Learning Technologies, Director of Staff Development, Campus administration || April-May 2011 || Time and Effort ||  ||   ||
 * Approach || Person Responsible || Timeline || Resources || Formative Evaluation || Summative Evaluation ||
 * E: Provide students with opportunities that will promote college and career readiness skills across all grade levels. ||  ||   ||   ||   || Student surveys indicate a post-secondary expectation exists in school at some level. ||
 * Deployment: ||||||  ||   ||   ||
 * 1. Deploy and assess the leading indicator system and improve with cycles of learning. ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * 2. Expand opportunities for students to take high school and college classes online through TxVSN and StateU. || Dir. Learning Technologies and CTE ||  ||   ||   ||   ||
 * 3 ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * 4 ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Target #11: Engage local departments of education to use BISD as a training and research location for student teachers because of our professional development program and educator expectations. ||
 * Approach || Person Responsible || Timeline || Resources || Formative Evaluation || Summative Evaluation ||
 * A: ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Deployment: ||||||  ||   ||   ||
 * 1 || Ass’t Supt for Human Resources. ||  ||   ||   ||   ||
 * 2 ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * 3 ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * 4 ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * 3 ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * 4 ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||